I finally decided that the story of the South Amherst couple hoping to inherit part of the estate of a multimillionaire was the most interesting.
To set up the story, this item appeared in the paper the previous year on June 22, 1925.
But then, as noted on the Feb. 9th front page, their hopes were dashed.
"An aged couple on Vivian-av have heard with sinking heart the news that a Michigan state prison convict may receive the entire estate of the late Edward B. Jennings, Chicago multimillionaire, which a court once said they would share.
"It meant to them that they may never see a penny of the $625,000 which a Chicago probate judge ruled eight months ago was to be theirs.
"Together they planned how they would build a nice home in Elyria and settle down to a life of ease and happiness for the remainder of the years.
"The couple is Mr. and Mrs. James C. Bogart. He is 72 and she is 68. They continue to toil and sacrifice as they have all their life.
"Mrs. Bogart was a relative of the Chicago recluse who died leaving an estate of $6,000,000. Like a bolt out of a clear blue sky came the announcement that she was one of the eight who would share in the money.
"Now Edward C. Koester, a convict at the Marquette, Mich., prison has filed in the Chicago court a will purporting to be that of Jennings.
"Koester alleges that his mother, now dead, was a sister of Jennings' wife."
It was a heartbreaking story – until I followed it to its conclusion.
The convict's claim fell apart fairly quickly, it would seem. The court case – Koester v. Jennings – is well documented online. The first will that Koester submitted revealed "discrepancies in the paper's production" which resulted in its denial by the pronate court. Koester then claimed that the first will was a forgery and that the original was lost. The second petition was also denied by the probate court. It dragged out in the Chicago courts until 1928.
But – justice prevailed and the Bogarts did get their money. I like a happy ending!
![]() |
| June 23, 1926 |
![]() |
| June 24, 1926 |





That turned out well, and was a great read with my morning coffee; thanks, Dan!
ReplyDeleteI wonder where they moved too in elyria? Would be interesting to see.
ReplyDeleteA lovely tale, Dan! Nice job following it through and telling us what became of the Bogarts.
ReplyDeleteIt's difficult to pick a single story to follow with all of them lined up so prettily. I'm happy things turned out as the Bogart's wished. A great post!
ReplyDeleteA couple things I'd like to note...
The piece on the Hollywood romance. Seems we haven't changed much when it comes to such scandals, have we?
And all the booze trouble. Through this period Lorain County Courts (as all other courts in the US at this time) were clogged with cases involving booze. The criminal dockets were overloaded to the point of collapse. A good lesson in how making something illegal doesn't make it go away.
But it wasn't the first time we'd gone through such a thing. In the 1890s, the state started applying its own control over the liquor trade. The courts handled so many cases of "Selling & Furnishing Intoxicating Liquor to a Minor" and "Selling & Furnishing Liquor to a Person in the Habit of getting Intoxicated" that the Clerk of Courts used a stamp to enter the charges instead of writing them. It was the only hand-stamped charge I saw in all of the county's criminal dockets.